The other day in class when we talk about Eva Luna talked about how there are many characters that seem irrelevant in the lives of Eva and the plot of the book. I liked to read that even if many of these characters reappear in the book and we can see what happened to them. For example, Eva meets Melesio (or Mimi), Hubert, and godmother. I like that the end is that the characters end interconnected, as we see Rolf Hubert and word knowledge. If Allende had not done this, I think so, many of the characters would have been irrelevant and useful only to fill space on the pages.
Another thing I liked was the history of Arabic. I found this part of the narrative was entertained me the most because there were otherparties when I was kind of boring. For example many of the parts of politics is not really liked them. I think this is only because I'm not interested in politics and I love to read books on this subject. At the same time, I think to put this book makes it seem like a more serious literature than it is, and perhaps may be the reason some people see this book as good literature.
In conclusion, I just want to say that although I do not think that Eva Luna is a high quality book, not to say that is a terrible book. To be really bad a book is to completely bored and then I have to feel bad because I lost hours of my life. I read Eva Luna entertaining moments during which I was and I felt so abu
0 comments:
Post a Comment